Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Created Panel
Our second panel is dedicated to understanding the role of voters and accountability in democracies with organized crime. Using experimental and survey evidence in Ecuador, El Salvador, and Mexico, as well as in a low-violence context like the Peruvian case, this panel offers relevant insights on civilians’ attitudes that shape how representation and accountability are held in organized crime-affected areas. On the one hand, it addresses citizens’ attitudes toward victims in the context of war, considering gender and non-gender-based violence, as well as attitudes toward unauthorized migrant populations who leave their countries amid criminal violence. On the other hand, this panel also addresses perceptions toward state actors and the regime type, examining popular perceptions toward threatened politicians (by criminal groups), the military in contexts affected by organized crime, and how the perceived presence of drug trafficking organizations shapes voter support for elections and democracy.
Electoral Support for Candidates Involved in Drug Trafficking - Mariana Victoria Ramirez Bustamante, Vanderbilt University
Criminal Violence and Attitudes toward Immigrants in Mexico - Omar Garcia-Ponce, George Washington University
Coercion or Co-opted? Differential Effect of Corruption for Voters in a Drug War - John Henry Murdy, University of Chicago