Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Created Panel
These papers take different perspectives to explore a similar idea: rejection of status quo institutions. What was once seemingly inevitable--democracy, EU deepening-- is now not only highly contested but highly politicized. Some of the papers feature internal sources of resistance (inefficiencies, protectionism) while others focus on strategies of ideologically-motivated external actors, from political parties to the media.
Support for European institutions, including policy harmonization, and national democratic consolidation have shifted from status quo matters-of-fact to deeply contested and highly politicized concepts. This panel examines how some institutions and actors have resisted these trends.
Conceptual Ambiguity and Autocracy: How Backsliding Regimes Portray Backsliding - Thomas Winzen, Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf
Explaining Mechanisms behind the EU’s Inefficiency during the Rule of Law Crisis - Gizem Kaftan, Boston University
The Race Away from Brussels and Challenges to EU Cohesion - Keith A Preble, Miami University
Beholding the Backsliders: European Media Coverage of Hungary and Poland - A. Maurits van der Veen, College of William & Mary