Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Created Panel
These exciting papers tackle how to better measure and examine judicial preferences and goals on the US Supreme Court.
Examining the Strategic Use of Judicial Philosophy in Supreme Court Opinions - Christopher Krewson, Brigham Young University; Albert Rivero, University of Virginia; Andrew R Stone, University of Mississippi
Taking Justices' Legal Preferences Seriously - Ben Johnson, Penn State Law; Logan Strother, Purdue University; Joan C. Timoneda, Purdue University
The Consistency of Federalist Society-Affiliated U.S. Supreme Court Justices - Tim Komatsu, University of Massachusetts - Amherst; Paul M. Collins, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
The Strategic Use of Constitutional Interpretation Methods by the Supreme Court - Madeline Mader, University of Colorado Boulder
Worldviews and Judicial Decision Making at the U.S. Supreme Court - Paul Lohse, Arizona State University