Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

FDI and Domestic Politics

Sun, September 8, 10:00 to 11:30am, Marriott Philadelphia Downtown, 412

Session Submission Type: Full Paper Panel

Session Description

How do domestic politics shape support for the foreign direct investment (FDI) regime, and how does FDI affect domestic political phenomena? This panel examines the roles of domestic political actors and institutions in generating support for the international FDI regime, as well as their influence on the patterns of FDI inflows and outflows. It also explores how FDI influences domestic politics. Huh investigates how the material interests of citizens and their normative preferences regarding the state’s regulatory autonomy affect the likelihood that government will settle investor-state disputes. Lugg and Oestman study how information about the costs and reciprocal benefits of the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) system influences public support for the ISDS mechanism. Jud’s research focuses on how transparency, through the provision of FDI incentives, contributes to attracting quality FDI projects, with a particular emphasis on the political motives of local politicians and the interests of local citizens. Kim, Kim, and Park examine the mitigating role of FDI on the impact of a Chinese trade shock on the rise of populism. Zhang focuses on the role of the Chinese government in strategically realigning the Chinese semiconductor industry’s outward FDI amid decreasing overall FDI outflows and escalating tensions between China and the United States. These papers utilize novel data, ranging from cross-national and sub-national data to survey experimental data.

Sub Unit

Individual Presentations

Chair

Discussants