Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Full Paper Panel
As many post-Watergate reforms turn fifty years old, we revisit how well several reforms have performed their intended purposes. We look specifically at emergency powers (Chris Edelson), war powers (Nancy Kassop), the federal budget (Jasmine Farrier), executive privilege (Kevin Baron), and executive branch oversight (Katy Harriger) to determine whether these reforms ever worked, continue to work, or need to be replaced. This discussion has important implications for the separation of powers, democracy, and the rule of law.
Emergency Power vs. Democratic Principles: The National Emergencies Act - Chris Edelson, American University
The Ethics in Government Act of 1978: Executive Accountability Revisited - Katy J. Harriger, Wake Forest University
Budget Processes, Institutional Power, and Political Courage: 1974-2024 - Jasmine Farrier, University of Louisville
Absolute Executive Privilege Absolutely: The Legacy of U. S. v. Nixon - Kevin M. Baron, Siena College
Fifty Years of the War Powers Resolution: Weakened, but Still Standing - Nancy Kassop, SUNY New Paltz