Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Nuclear Weapons and Military Alliances

Sun, September 8, 10:00 to 11:30am, Marriott Philadelphia Downtown, 410

Session Submission Type: Full Paper Panel

Session Description

Nuclear weapons are inseparable from deterrence in modern military alliances. States often use threats or promises of nuclear use to bolster or undermine the perceived credibility of alliance commitments. This panel explores the diverse consequences of using nuclear weapons to these ends. We consider how nuclear protection shapes military investments, alliance reassurance, tradeoffs between burden-sharing and non-proliferation, and reactions to nuclear threats. This panel brings together emerging scholars from all over the world to address important issues at the intersection of nuclear weapons and military alliances.

Alley addresses whether adversary nuclear threats provoke or intimidate support for intervention in a foreign crisis. Blankenship explores whether there is a trade-off between encouraging conventional defense burden-sharing and discouraging nuclear proliferation among allies, while Gannon studies how assurances of protection from nuclear patrons shape the conventional arming decisions of their allies. Ko and Lee focus on the ways in which the visibility of a nuclear patron’s assurances of protection shapes how reassured allies are by those signals of support. Sukin, Lanoszka and Herzog show how reassured U.S. allies were by American assurances of support in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Sub Unit

Individual Presentations

Chair

Discussants