Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Author meet critics
It is probably not news that economic inequality has been steadily growing for the past few decades – in the United States and in much of the developed world. There is no shortage of data confirming this well-documented trend. There is less consensus as to what this all means for political and social life. In his forthcoming Princeton University Press book, leading political theorist David Lay Williams tries to make sense of the various political implications of inequality through Plato, Jesus, Hobbes, Rousseau, Smith, J.S. Mill, and Karl Marx.
According to Williams, the robust debate surrounding inequality has too often ignored some of the most compelling voices on the topic. Economists and normative philosophers tend to dominate these discussions. It is now fashionable to argue that inequality is only a problem if it leads to poverty and starvation. That is, the problem is not inequality but poverty.
The aforementioned philosophers, Williams contends, add much to our understanding of inequality. Each approaches it in his unique way and highlights issues and problems that escape much modern thinking.
This panel will examine Williams' effort to broaden our understanding of inequality through the history of political thought.