Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Over the last several decades the representation of LGBTQ+ interests in the political realm has changed dramatically. This has been especially true at the state level, where legislatures enacted civil union protections and gay marriage rights long before changes at the federal level made this more likely. Some scholars argue that substantive representation- when policy reflects the interests of constituents- is most likely to occur when groups are descriptively represented. However, there are very few LGBTQ+ elected officials at any level of government. This paper uses this lack of descriptive representation as a way to explore other conditions under which substantive representation may occur. I argue that Black female legislators are instrumental in producing policy that reflects public opinion that is supportive of marginalized groups. The long history of marginalization of Black women elected officials has meant that Black female legislators are uniquely poised to fight for the rights of underrepresented interests.