Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
With the rise of political conflicts in Latin America, what makes a regime legitimate? To test this, I analyze trust in the national police - a key institution that represents the rule of law. What factors explain the variance in expressed trust in the national police? Does it differ among marginalized groups? I argue that support for the president is a fundamental factor to trust the police in personalized, authoritarian regimes, but not in institutionalized democracies. I compare attitudes towards national police between Costa Rica and Nicaragua, two neighboring countries with distinct regimes. Utilizing AmericasBarometer data, the statistical analyses reveal regime legitimacy dynamics: Highly personalized regimes like Nicaragua lead citizens to evaluate political institutions based on their views of the president, regardless of marginalized group status, while in democracies, views of institutions such as the national police have little to do with one’s views of the president. This highlights the impact of cult identity in personalized regimes and a threat to democratic principles.