Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
During the ratification debates, the Federalists and Antifederalists cited the work of Montesquieu to make arguments in support of or against the proposed Constitution. The Federalist cites lengthy material from “the celebrated Montesquieu,” and Publius claims to be representing his thought correctly in contrast to their Antifederalist counterparts. This paper will give a close examination of Montesquieu’s republican theory, and then it will assess whether Publius should be viewed as Montesquieu's rightful heir.