Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The contemporary landscape of national security policies, threat perception analysis, force buildup processes, and national crisis management is heavily influenced by cybersecurity. However, many states grapple with challenges in assessing national cyber crises due to the inherent ambiguity between civil and military cyber threats. States consistently face difficulties in distinctly defining the line separating minor cyber incidents, managed by the private sector with law enforcement agencies, from national-scale cyber crises requiring intelligence agencies' monitoring and military response. This fundamental cyber challenge raises critical questions: How do states evaluate the severity of cyber-attacks? When do cyber-attacks constitute a "national crisis," necessitating national or military actions? Can states delineate the threshold between cybercrime and cyber acts of war? What is the role of the general security context in assessing cyber threat and forging preparedness capacities? This paper aims to address these questions, focusing on the Israeli national case.