Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Democracy is often viewed as an effective instrument of conflict resolution. I show that the arguments that support this expectation are founded on a false dichotomy between voting and fighting, which omits the option to settle conflicts by bargaining. A self-enforcing democratic method of conflict resolution cannot improve what can be achieved through bargaining. Either the conflict resolution through voting is reproducible through bargaining or, when it is not, the conflicting parties would prefer to bargain rather than hold elections. Unless the notion of democracy as a replacement of governments through elections is stretched to the verge of tautology and includes bargaining and compromise as constitutive elements, the theoretical basis for linking civil peace with democracy is tenuous.