Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Why are human rights treaties opposed by their intended beneficiaries, and what are the consequences? I argue that the resistance of treaty beneficiaries, rooted in material concerns over the distributive effects of human rights treaties, can fracture transnational advocacy networks and alter policymakers' calculus, making non-compliance more likely. I illustrate the theory by tracing the adoption and aftermath of a law contravening international treaties against child labor. Drawing on my extensive fieldwork in Bolivia, I use data from in-depth interviews, as well as legislative records, newspaper articles, and public statements. By exploiting within-case variation, the case shows how normative contestation from treaty beneficiaries can disrupt traditional channels of advocacy influence, refining seminal transnational activism models.