Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Prior research on labor market dualism has examined that workers with insecure, unstable, and uncertain employment (i.e., outsiders) are less likely to engage in politics and more likely to support right-wing populist parties compared to labor market insiders. However, little has been discussed about whether such findings can be applicable to the US contexts due to the unusual features embedded in the US institutional configurations and economic structures. Considering these gaps, this paper focuses on the concept of "precarity" and illuminates the discrepancies between labor market outsiders and insiders in terms of their welfare attitudes and political orientations. Moreover, this paper compares how employment and relevant status differently affect workers' attitudes across salient divisions in the US political landscapes - e.g., industrial sectors, race/ethnicity, and spatial/regional characteristics - by examining the conditional effects of them found in GSS datasets. This elementary study contributes to the burgeoning work in the American Political Economy field by linking contextual formations to attitudinal factors and provides implications with research on public welfare perceptions.