Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
A Sour Friendship? A big data approach in studying the information landscape of international human rights advocacy
Do advocacy efforts for different human rights issues compete against each other? In this research, I categorize human rights concerns into three topics: physical integrity rights, political rights, and socio-economic rights. Conceptually and empirically, the three human rights categories suggest different urgency and visibility levels of the violations in the eyes of domestic and international audiences. Conventionally, transnational human rights actors, including human rights scholars, are more concerned with the first two types of rights. As attention on socioeconomic human rights issues grows, does this imply that people's focus shifts away from physical integrity rights and political rights?
In this paper, I utilize a novel large-scale dataset including the news reports from eight major English media outlets as well as the Google trend data on people’s search records of relevant human rights topics spanning the last decade to explore the potential tension among campaigns addressing different subjects in transnational human rights advocacy. These two data sources provide a comprehensive view of the information landscape within international human rights advocacy, encompassing both the aspects of information provision and demand. The primary empirical results suggest the existence of long-lasting competition among different human rights topics for media attention and people’s concerns.