Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Third World countries are said to have been insistent on the idea of authoritative allocation in the economic field, and are reluctant to cede their discretionary power vis-à-vis relevant international institutions. Although such developing countries have come to accept the idea of marketization with the tide of globalization, there are temporal gaps as to when they domestically accept the system and when they officially commit to the idea in international institutions. For example, it took China seven years to officially talk about South-South cooperation after its inauguration. This paper theorizes that it is the realistic motivation to dominate the market that renders the timing of commitment on the international level. It first introduces a new dataset to show that the larger its power becomes vis-à-vis its rivals, China favors less references to the respect for state autonomy in the economic draft resolutions at the United Nations General Assembly. Secondly, it takes up the case study on the draft resolutions on South-South cooperation and the Least Developed Countries to verify the hypothesis.