Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

The Promise of Deliberative Democracy in Reproductive Rights Discourse

Sat, September 7, 4:00 to 5:30pm, Marriott Philadelphia Downtown, 402

Abstract

Deliberative democracy emerges as a crucial approach when tackling contentious topics like reproductive rights and access. The inherent complexities and deeply held beliefs surrounding these issues necessitate a framework that fosters inclusivity, informed decision-making, and respectful dialogue.
Firstly, the inclusivity of deliberative democracy ensures that a diverse range of voices is heard. Reproductive rights involve a myriad of perspectives, from women and LGBTQ+ individuals to religious groups, healthcare professionals, and policymakers. Deliberative processes, like Deliberative Polling, provide a platform for these voices to be expressed and understood, promoting a more comprehensive and equitable decision-making process.
Secondly, informed decision-making is central to deliberative democracy. In the realm of reproductive rights, where scientific, medical, ethical, and cultural considerations intersect, having an informed public is crucial. Deliberative processes facilitate access to expert opinions and comprehensive information, enabling participants to make decisions based on a solid understanding of the complexities involved. This contrasts with traditional democratic processes that may be more susceptible to oversimplification or emotional rhetoric.
Moreover, deliberative democracy encourages respectful engagement and constructive dialogue. Contentious debates often lead to polarization, making it challenging for individuals on opposite sides to find common ground. Deliberative processes create an environment where participants actively listen, engage empathetically, and consider alternative perspectives. This fosters a space conducive to finding shared values and goals, even in the face of deeply rooted disagreements.
The principles of autonomy and agency are also upheld through deliberative democracy. Individuals directly affected by reproductive rights issues should have the opportunity to actively participate in decision-making processes that impact their lives. Deliberative democracy empowers citizens to engage meaningfully in discussions and contribute to shaping policies that respect their autonomy, moving away from top-down decision-making approaches.
Furthermore, the potential for policy stability emerges as a significant benefit. Reproductive rights are often subject to frequent changes influenced by shifts in political power and public opinion. Deliberative processes, by involving citizens in ongoing and reflective discussions, may lead to more stable and enduring policies. Collective decisions, grounded in a deeper understanding of the issues, could contribute to policies that transcend short-term political considerations.
While critics may highlight the time and resource intensity of deliberative democracy, the long-term benefits, including increased public trust, more durable policies, and a deeper understanding of complex issues, outweigh these concerns. The costs associated with contentious debates and policy reversals in the absence of informed and inclusive decision-making processes can be more significant.
This paper presents the first-ever national US Deliberative Poll on reproductive access. Over 200 participants from across the US joined a virtual Deliberative Polling event to discuss how, if at all, policies toward reproductive access and reproductive rights should be amended. Being able to hold this deliberative event in the US is a significant path forward, as liberals and conservatives were randomly assigned to small groups and discussed this contentious issue in a civil and thoughtful manner. Furthermore, the results of this event demonstrated that the general public care deeply about this issue and want policies in the US to reflect the public’s opinions.

Author