Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Burgeoning radical right support poses a dilemma for the mainstream left. In the popular narrative, center-left parties radicalize to the right on sociocultural issues to recoup disillusioned working-class voters. Yet this strategy risks losing the support of social liberals who disagree with the party's hard-right turn. How can the mainstream left respond to the radical right without jeopardizing the support of their two core constituencies? I argue that center-left parties resolve this dilemma by adopting right-wing sociocultural positions in only those districts where the radical right poses a threat. I employ dynamic ideal point models to estimate the sociocultural positions of candidates, drawing from comprehensive issue preference surveys that encompass the near-universe of candidates from recent national parliamentary elections in Denmark and Finland. In both countries, I find that district-level increases in radical right support are associated with center-left candidates radicalizing rightwards on sociocultural issues. These findings contribute to our understanding of how radical right parties affect the electoral strategies of other parties and highlight the importance of looking at the district level to discern these strategies.