Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
As Political Scientists, we are uniquely positioned to teach our students about the functions of democracy, the perils of democratic backsliding, and the factors that support democratization or authoritarianism. Understanding these issues at an intellectual level, however, does not guarantee that students will become civically engaged or politically active. I suggest that a major obstacle to political participation among young people is not only lack of knowledge or even apathy, but rather lack of hope. Many educated young people, like the students in our classrooms, are acutely aware of major issues confronting them, from the global environmental crisis to the retrenchment of democracy. The more they learn about it, the more the problems may seem overwhelming, and rather than being inspired to act, students may end up demoralized into inaction. In order to counter this potential drawback and foster civic education, I propose that Political Scientists adopt a pedagogy of hope. Such an approach aims to inform, inspire and motivate. This involves paying closer attention to theories that underline human agency, including success stories among the cases studied, and encouraging students to explore potential avenues for activism in their own communities. A pedagogy of hope also underlines the importance of inclusive syllabi.