Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
While many scholars underscore the importance of status concerns in understanding a state's conflict behavior, there remains a limited understanding of the origins of such concerns. Little is known about why states experience these concerns and what contributes to status dissatisfaction. Previous scholarship emphasizes "status inconsistency" or the disparity between the status attributed to a state by the international community and the status the state believes it deserves. They often assume that a state’s expectations regarding status are grounded in its military and economic capabilities. Building on research in psychology and sociology, I argue that material capabilities are not the sole source of status anxiety or dissatisfaction. The experience of status decline in relevant communities also prompts dissatisfaction and concerns, thereby triggering aggressive actions. Using innovative network analytic techniques to identify underlying communities and testing my hypotheses on 200-year militarized interstate disputes, I demonstrate that a state's status decline in communities is significantly associated with an increased probability of militarized interstate disputes.