Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Why do some states resolve territorial conflicts peacefully while others do not? We explore this question by investigating the level of similarity between the two states' legal institutions, specifically property rights. We argue that the greater the level of similarity between two states' property rights, the more likely we may observe their nonviolent resolution of territorial conflict between them. To examine this argument, we use data covering all interstate territorial disputes, resolution types, and property rights institutions between claimant and defendant states from 1945–2015. This study has implications for the conflict management literature, suggesting that shared legal norms – beyond attributes like regime type and joint membership in IOs - may play an essential role in resolving disputes between states.