Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Political scientists and mathematicians have created a number of clever measures and metrics to detect the presence of partisan gerrymandering. These measures include the efficiency gap, mean-median, extreme outcomes, GEO metric, and other measures of partisan gerrymandering. All of these measures fail to incorporate race and the voting rights protections for voters of color. This paper presents a critique of the extant measures for failing to incorporate communities of interest by race; and protection of minority voting rights. I also present alternative measures that incorporate race and fairness as well as partisan metrics. I show that some alleged redistricting maps using partisan-only metrics that are fair are in fact biased against voters of color; and that some redistricting maps that score poorly on partisan metrics in fact are fair for race and voting rights reasons. I use U.S. congressional and state legislative maps newly passed in 2022 to measure and motivate these critiques and new measures.