Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Are environmental issues like climate change considered a threat primarily by those
on the left? Or can those on the right be made to care about the impending threat these issues pose? Violent attacks such as the Uvalde and Buffalo shootings committed by white nationalists warn of a disturbing future for environmental politics. The beliefs of the perpetrators of these disturbing acts have been labeled as “ecofascist”, as manifestos published online blame immigrants for overpopulation and environmental destruction of Western nations. Ecofascism is an ideology that links environmentalism to white supremacy and provides a platform to reject outsiders. Though not yet empirically studied, I attempt to ground this concept in right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance, and nationalism which involve outgroup aggression and hierarchy. Using a survey experiment, I test if support for the environment and ecofascism among the right can be mediated by the effect of right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance, and nationalism. By framing climate change with these appeals, I find that my three proposed mediators do not necessarily drive support for environmental policy among the sample much less the Republican and right-leaning respondents. Generally, those with higher right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and nationalism do support ecofascist proposals but only among those just have these predispositions but not necessarily among Republicans or right-learners.