Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
How much do voters support the welfare state? Under what conditions do voters become more supportive of redistribution? While current income level and perception of risk are both widely studied for cross-sectional comparison, how changes in economic standing interact with risk perception is relatively less explained. Building on the insight from the rational expectation hypothesis, I contend that voters interpret their job loss differently depending on whether it is expected or not. Employing the Swiss Household Panel (SHP) data, I find that becoming unemployed increases the workers’ taste for redistribution. However, I also find that the effect is bigger when individuals perceive a low level of risk ex-ante.