Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
How does counterintelligence affect international organization? To answer this question, we present a formal model of domestic response to espionage. In the model, the state can learn about a foreign agent's activities from choices made in preceding periods. Foreign agents can moderate these actions to suppress the likelihood that they are discovered. States will only intervene when espionage exceeds a tacitly agreed threshold, and excesses emerge when agents cannot be incentivized to moderate espionage activities due the prospect of potentially lucrative intelligence. An executive's choice to deter produces countervailing incentives between the intelligence community's preferences and the executive's audience cost. We find that egregious punishment of spies and blowback from the international community can make avoiding escalation less likely. We analyze these findings in the context of media revelations of Chinese espionage in the early 2020s. We conclude with suggestions for other application areas like counter-terrorism and cyberwarfare.