Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Colonizing powers often built militaries in the territories they colonized, but when they did so,they faced a dilemma: make the military too weak and the colony is defenseless, but make it too strong and the colony can rebel. Scholars have argued that, as a result, colonizers often relied on ethnic stacking (i.e., the recruitment from one religious or ethnic group and the exclusion of others) as a way to increase the size of their colonies’ militaries while avoiding unity between the military and general population. However, I argue that, in actuality, reliance on ethnic stacking varied both between colonizers and across a colonizer’s colonies. My paper shows that varying levels of direct competition over colonies and a colony’s proximity to broader conflict led to variation in how colonial powers designed their colonies’ militaries. I present an original dataset on the ethnic composition of both the officer corps and the rank-and-file in African colonies from 1925-1945, based on archival research.