Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The literature on party and elite cues has documented well that political elites shape, among other political and policy stances, citizens’ regime preferences. In this paper, we examine the demand and supply side of this process. Which kinds of political parties are more likely to influence their supporters’ tolerance of democratic transgressions? And which kinds of voters are more easily swayed by their favoured parties to accept democratic transgressions? Our theoretical focus is 1) normative commitment to democracy and 2) ideological polarization. We ask: Are political parties and/or voters with more authoritarian and more extreme views more likely to support democratic transgressions? These relationships have been previously explored in the literature on political parties, but mostly separately. By examining simultaneously both the supply and demand side of party influence on voters’ regime preferences and teasing their causal primacy, we contribute to the literatures on democracy and voting behaviour. Our empirical focus is the Czech Republic, where we field vignette survey experiment. We find that party system polarization both the demand and the supply side is the primary driver of democratic transgressions.