Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Crisis events may motivate political elites to use salient communication in responding to the crisis. This paper examines how European Union ministers employed grandstanding messages to set agendas in reaction to financial crises between 2010 and 2016. Using a transformer classifier trained on a modified dataset from US congressional hearing messages related to grandstanding behaviour, we identified the grandstanding behaviour of EU ministers over time. We employed a difference-in-differences design to estimate the responses of different countries across time in the Council of the European Union. Our preliminary findings suggest that as Euroscepticism in countries increases, European ministers are more likely to use crises as opportunities for grandstanding. This strategy intensified debates and discussions against policies directly impacting their respective countries. Such actions shaped public perceptions of political issues and gained political leverage during the crisis. The implications of these findings yield an explanation of both the impacts of crises on European elites' communication and the influence of strategic crisis communication on agenda-setting.