Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In 2021, sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) inclusion gained new ground when the United States sponsored a SOGI inclusive free and fair elections UN General Assembly resolution that passed by consensus. Passed by consensus, in this case, does not mean fully endorsed. Using text and discourse analysis, this paper asks how a consensus-passed resolution reveals active and passive forms of exclusion. It argues that anti-gender/LGBTIQ+ member states disassociating from SOGI-inclusive language remain optically in favor of the resolution’s subject matter. By dissociating from the language of SOGI rather than requesting a vote, states unsupportive of SOGI inclusion signal an attempt to remove themselves and any questionable undemocratic domestic practice from critique. It further argues that attempts to separate anti-SOGI inclusion from democratic norm acceptance enable future exclusion of other vulnerable populations from UN agendas.