Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In June 2023, U.S. President Joe Biden indicated that the will support Ukraine following Russia’s invasion for “as long as it takes.” This paper examines the implications of the U.S.’s unconditional support for Ukraine on other areas of U.S. foreign policy. Using the U.S. Strategy toward Sub-Saharan Africa and the Indo-Pacific Strategy as empirical examples, we argue that the US’s immediate prioritization of supporting Ukraine has undermined the credibility of its commitments to its African and Southeast Asian partners. The paper traces how processes to legitimate U.S. support towards Ukraine, based on Russia’s violation of the rules-based international order, trumped the material commitments to Africa and Indo-Pacific. Further, we question the cumulative effects of the U.S.’s prioritization of Ukraine and find that the U.S.’s ability to “modernize” enduring partnerships in each region is constrained by its ability to offer credible, strategic means that address the core policy concerns of African and Indo-Pacific countries. Finally, the paper considers how the U.S.’s indeterminate material support of Ukraine signals conditional allegiance to allies in the Global South and takes for granted the agency of African and Southeast Asian actors in crafting and shaping their preferences, including their alliances. In short, credible commitments to one partner might undermine the credibility of others