Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
A new literature has addressed the role that authoritarian regional organizations play in sustaining autocratic rule. Yet many regional organizations have heterogeneous political memberships, including both democratic and authoritarian members. We argue that decision-making rules strongly affect the ability of organizations to support democracy and human rights and to discourage democratic backsliding. Using the case of ASEAN, we argue that consensus rules in the organization have both limited the development of explicitly democratic and human rights norms—despite periodic pressures from democratic members to do so—and correspondingly reduced the ability of the organization to respond to episodes of authoritarian regress.