Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Many studies suggest that citizens' policy preferences are inconsistent with underlying interests or priorities. Traditionally, these studies measure the importance citizens attach to a particular priority and examine whether their policy preferences align with that priority. However, this widespread approach makes two critical oversights: First, different priorities are relevant to different policy issues. Second, citizens can ground each policy preference in many different priorities. I fix these problems in a randomized survey, wherein a representative sample of Americans matches multiple priorities with multiple policy proposals. I find that scholars' decisions on what priorities and policies to study greatly impact how competent citizens seem. Moreover, accounting for the fact that citizens can ground their preferences in different priorities reveals that citizens are far more competent than past research has suggested. The apparent incompetence of citizens is more a reflection of scholars' choices than citizens themselves.