Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
As evidence of climate change is becoming stronger, even if polarization is high, some polluting groups are showing increasing support for environmental policies. The interaction between politicians, polluting interest groups, and workers in the polluting sectors can represent a possibility of constructive collaboration or an attempt to slow down the pace of effective green policies. How is evidence of climate change influencing groups' lobbying strategies? Does evidence of climate change increase the number of environmental NGOs lobbying and how polluting companies behave? What kind of green policies do polluting interest groups support? I constructed a panel dataset with the number of lobbying declarations for and against environmental regulation and natural disasters as units of analysis by county and year (from 2009 to 2016) for three states in the USA. I obtained evidence that lobbying "undecided" on environmental policies at the state level increases after a natural calamity with respect to lobbying "against" the same policies.