Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
“Democratization through strength” represents a frequently overlooked pathway through which authoritarian regimes actively transit themselves out of non-democratic rules in response to crises. The existing literature has not adequately acknowledged this “regime change without elite change” pattern, as previous research fails to conflate elite responses to immediate shocks arising from crises with their confidence in enduring self-led democratization, informed by their knowledge of long-term political landscapes.
In this conference presentation, I hope to propose an all-encompassing analytical framework, arguing that a comprehensive understanding of elite choices in the face of economic crises necessitates examining how they synthesize their prior knowledge of inherent strength with their contextualized perceptions of crisis-induced threats to generate posterior information. Elites can make collective decisions on whether to democratize regimes or not, based on their shared posterior beliefs communicated through elite networks.
To exemplify this framework, I utilize the empirical case of Indonesia’s 1998 transition out of the New Order regime. Concurrently, as a corollary of my theoretical propositions, I endeavor to challenge the prevailing belief that Indonesia’s case represents democratization through weakness. Contrarily, I demonstrate that, while elites encountered considerable pressure during the 1998 economic crisis, their decision to abandon the New Order was not solely a reaction to mitigate potential threats but also a manifestation of their confidence in weathering this self-led transition. This argument contravenes current narratives asserting that the internal weakness of the New Order regime primarily contributed to the transition, thereby exemplifying the importance of contextualizing the political consequences of economic crises within a more extensive temporal framework.