Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
How does "sanctuary" for Second Amendment rights deter or motivate voters? This paper examines the consequences of counties adopting resolutions declaring themselves "Second Amendment Sanctuaries" by defying state and federal laws following the 2018 midterm elections. We develop a theoretical framework for how these protections motivate and de-motivate specific racial groups. Using state-level voter file data, we show the passage of these protections served to empower white voters, increasing their turnout in sanctuary counties. In contrast, these laws acted as deterrents for black voters, leading to significant reductions in their voter participation. Further, we validate these findings using CCES data. These findings underscore the complex role of local government in motivating and intimidating specific racial groups to drive election outcomes.