Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Democratic backsliding, the slow erosion of democratic institutions, processes, and norms, has become more pronounced in recent years. This paper develops a conceptual framework for explaining backsliding that builds on historical, sociological, economic, and political science approaches. The institutionalist approaches favored by these fields often emphasize the role of “surrogate organizations” –single-issue groups, certain types of media organizations, and cultural institutions such as churches–that parties recruit in order to expand their voter bases, sometimes with the risk of pushing conservative parties even farther to the right. While insightful, the institutionalist literature offers little about the role of social technologies that have the capacity to organize and incorporate fragmented extremist networks that present even greater challenges to party leadership and principles. We correct this oversight by developing a “connective action framework” that explains how digitally networked organization can bring scattered extremist factions into conservative parties, pushing them in illiberal directions.