Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Democratic decision-making is often claimed to require the “wisdom of the crowds”, “collective intelligence” and the “democratization of expertise”. At the same time, expert knowledge is crucial for enlightened will and opinion formation in complex political issues. By involving both random citizens and professional experts, citizens’ assemblies offer a great opportunity to combine different types of knowledge. Nevertheless, professional experts have been observed to have a big influence on assembly members, pushing aside lay and local knowledge. This paper examines the Southampton Citizens’ Climate Assembly’s attempt to achieve a more inclusive and democratic knowledge-building process by introducing and analysing "citizen witnesses" alongside professional experts. Preliminary analyses of survey results and field notes indicate that the citizen witnesses were perceived to supplement the information provided by the professional experts and were therefore highly valued by assembly members. In addition, the citizen witnesses prompted some assembly members to share their own personal experiences, and to reflect on their privileges and blind spots.