Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
When conflict management fails, it is important to look beyond the dysfunctional relationship between the key protagonists. Intrastate conflicts are often embedded in broader networks of rivalry and cooperation, and the relationships of the protagonists to the “third parties” in their networks is often key to understanding variation in conflict management efficacy. This study draws from existing literature and examines key mechanisms by which third-party dynamics could prevent effective conflict management: veto-player problems; principal-agent problems; and proxy-war problems. It uses social network analysis, including Stochastic Actor Oriented Models (SAOMs), to model intrastate conflict management as endogenous to changes in the interstate networks of conflict and cooperation. The analyses thereby test the observable implications and demonstrate the explanatory power of each of the proposed mechanisms.