Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
China’s rapid economic ascent is often attributed to a political tournament model, yet the implications of such interjurisdictional competition on local social welfare investment remain underexplored. This study posits that local officials, vying for promotion, may prioritize immediate economic gains over social welfare initiatives, which typically yield less visible benefits and require a sustained, long-term investment. We hypothesize that heightened political competition among jurisdictions incentivizes officials to allocate funds in a manner conducive to career advancement, often at the expense of social welfare spending. This trend is particularly pronounced during the initial phase of a city leader's tenure when the likelihood of promotion is uncertain, thereby inducing a cyclical pattern in welfare policy. Our analysis utilizes a comprehensive panel dataset spanning prefecture-level regions to substantiate our claims empirically.