Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
How can machine learning assist in classifying court decisions when coded information is unavailable, especially in nondemocratic court settings? This paper explores the application of unsupervised learning models, including Latent Dirichlet Allocation, word vector summaries, and the BERT model, in analyzing bilingual judgments. Leveraging a dataset of 25,000 appeal cases released by the Judiciary of Hong Kong, the study extracts document-level topic proportions and transfer-learning-based features. These features are then utilized to classify appeal outcomes, and the performance of different models is compared. The research also investigates the influence of judges' nationality on coded appeal outcomes, controlling for judgment text. By employing machine learning techniques, this paper demonstrates how political scientists can access previously unavailable information about nondemocratic courts, highlighting the potential impact of such approaches in enhancing our understanding of legal systems.