Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Recent scholarly debate suggests a waning influence of traditional cleavages and party identifications on Western voting behavior, with issue ownership voting not sufficiently bridging this gap. This study proposes a novel approach by examining whether political brands and leaders' images are pivotal in shaping voter preferences. The integration of voting behavior and political marketing literature provides a fresh perspective, one that has been overlooked in previous research.
The paper embarks on a theoretical distinction between the brand concept and existing heuristics and voting models. It advances by measuring the brand value of Taiwan's leading political parties, employing survey data gathered before the 2024 general elections. This brand value serves as the cornerstone for our empirical analysis, scrutinizing the impact of party branding on voter decisions.
The investigation culminates in a significant revelation: Political Brand Value (PBV) exerts influence over voting choices, even when controlling for other pertinent explanatory variables. This finding suggests that political branding is more than a mere electoral accessory; it is a critical determinant in modern electoral processes. The implications of this discovery extend to political campaign strategies and the broader understanding of voter behavior dynamics in the digital age.