Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Government debt is often the remnants of past administrations that have accrued liabilities to underwrite corrupt practices or other 'odious' endeavors such as oppression or wars of aggression. This study examines the impact of such odious debt on present-day willingness to undertake fiscal sacrifices for debt repayment, and how it affects the negotiation dynamics between creditor and debtor states. We postulate that there exists a moral aversion to repaying odious debt as opposed to debt contracted for commendable purposes, such as infrastructure development and counter-cyclical social policies. Survey experiments conducted in Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa reveal that informing respondents of the odious origins of debt has a substantial deterrent effect on the propensity to support current debt repayments and engenders a preference for tougher negotiations with international creditors regarding repayment terms. Complementing our experimental data, an observational study uncovers a positive association between the presence of odious debt and the incidence of creditor concessions, or 'haircuts,' in debt restructuring discussions.