Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Research in the field of political science increasingly recognizes the significance of social norms in shaping political behavior. Yet, the question which factors influence norms remains largely understudied. I posit that emotional reactions from political elites can serve as important informational cues about what behaviors are deemed appropriate within a specific context, beyond the substantive content of elite messages. I test this hypothesis in the context of right-wing political violence in Germany. By analyzing a large dataset of elite communication on social media, I employ large language models and a staggered difference-in-differences approach to identify how politicians utilize different moral-emotional appeals following acts of political violence. Triangulating this observational evidence with survey experiments, I further demonstrate that the emotional responses of politicians can either safeguard or undermine norms concerning political violence among their partisan supporters. These findings have substantial implications for how politicians may uphold or erode crucial democratic norms by using emotional expressions as a powerful source of social influence.