Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Scholarship on congressional oversight of the bureaucracy portrays members of Congress as first movers in determining the timing and content of oversight. However, by strategically providing political information, bureaucratic agencies can direct oversight toward the issues and policies they favor. Using novel data on the universe of tweets posted by hundreds of U.S. executive agencies, we document the agenda-setting power of bureaucracies for oversight. We estimate the effect of agencies' adoption of Twitter on the frequency and content of oversight using a staggered difference-in-differences design. We find two sets of results. First, Twitter adoption preempts formal oversight by reducing the frequency with which bureaucratic witnesses appear before committees. Second, the topics discussed during oversight hearings closely track the content posted by agencies on Twitter. These findings contribute to our understanding of the active role of bureaucracies in shaping the political agenda through the strategic disseminating of policy information via social media and its impact on the dynamics of congressional oversight.