Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Social scientists have long studied how to improve intergroup relationships, including
strategies to counter anti-immigrant sentiment. This article contributes to this scholarship
by examining a salient but understudied topic: how to reduce citizen support for the use
of state violence against undocumented immigrants—at a moment when governments
across the world increasingly respond to immigration with militarization, often with the
support of local populations. Using original data from a panel survey in Mexico, we first
document that stereotypes linking immigrants to criminality are associated with negative
emotions and support for anti-immigrant state repression. We then examine whether
interventions that elicit emotions favoring victims over perpetrators improve attitudes.
Compared to a control condition, we find that real-life campaigns combining factual
information about the rule of law with originally-collected immigrant testimonies on
experiences with repression credibly evokes compassion towards victims and anger
against perpetrators, prompting condemnation of state violence and demands for justice.