Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Several Latin American democracies are experiencing simultaneous policy challenges: an unprecedented wave of Venezuelan migrants, a rise in criminal violence, and increased authoritarian attitudes among the mass public. Our paper asks whether Latin American citizens favor a more punitive response to criminal violence when crimes are perpetrated by Venezuelan migrants. We argue that natives favor a harsher response against newcomers because crimes perpetrated by immigrants activate threat perceptions, which leads people to draw a sharper distinction between in-groups and out-groups. We test this expectation by using public opinion data from Chile. We assess whether salient assassinations of police officers lead to more punitive anti-crime preferences when the perpetrator is Venezuelan. We also conduct a survey experiment to evaluate whether the national origin of a criminal suspect (Chilean or Venezuelan) affects the punishment preferences of people in Chile. Finally, we assess the effectiveness of two policy interventions to reduce punitive discrimination against Venezuelan migrants.