Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Can foreign aid reduce political violence in refugee hosting areas? Previous studies have warned that aid projects near refugee camps can be exploited by armed groups to fuel civil conflicts. However, recent research provides evidence that the presence of refugees can attract more foreign aid and improve well-being in refugee hosting communities, thereby reducing the potential for political violence. In this article, I argue that refugee policies matter. Policies that liberalize refugees' freedom of movement and their right to work initiate an economic spillover from aid allocation near refugee camps and mitigate tension between locals and refugees, thereby decreasing civil conflicts. Conversely, restrictive refugee policies may hinder the sharing of aid between refugees and the host community, creating opportunities for refugee militarization and civil conflict. By analyzing the impact of World Bank aid in 767 refugee-hosting provinces across 48 countries in the Global South, I found that aid allocation in countries with inclusive refugee policies mitigates conflict in refugee-hosting provinces. However, the liberalization of refugee policy also has a side effect: it increases conflict in provinces without a refugee presence.