Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Do surveys on international relations capture sincere public opinion? Media companies and research institutes, especially in democracies, often conduct public opinion surveys on how the government addresses foreign affairs. Previous literature finds that policymakers rely on these surveys as an important source for decision-making. However, it is possible that the answers to a survey are plagued by social desirability bias. For example, if it is widely believed that most of the citizens in a country prefer military solutions over a contentious issue, hawkish answers may be overrepresented if a survey uses direct questions. If that is the case, decision-makers may not know the true opinion of the public. To investigate this possibility, we conduct a list experiment in Japan to examine whether and how many Japanese people support military options or concessions for the Senkaku/Diaoyu island dispute with China and the Northern Territorial Issue with Russia. Our study has both academic and policy implications. Academically, if we find evidence for social desirability bias, this study will challenge the conventional wisdom that democracies have an advantage in international relations because they can reveal credible information in interstate bargaining. Regarding policy, without survey designs that account for social desirability bias, foreign policy decision-makers would make their decisions based on biased information on public opinion.