Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
A prominent paradigm demonstrates many White Americans respond negatively to information about their declining population share. But this paradigm considers the racial shift in a single context which also produces a general status threat response across otherwise conceptually distinct outcomes. Existing treatments jointly manipulate concepts like prototypicality threat, realistic threat, collective angst, and general alarm about demographic shifts, undercutting the ability to explain precisely Whites’ responses. We validate the existing intervention by contrasting Whites’ reactions to racial shifts in explicitly cultural or political contexts. If the racial shift produces a general sense of status threat, then we should find comparable attitudinal responses across contexts. We validate this shift by contrasting treatment effects across the 3 manipulations using 4 existing mechanisms, 3 existing dependent variables, and one new dependent variable. We thus clarify an intervention used prominently, with results cited frequently, to understand native majorities’ responses to demographic change.