Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Why do some conflicts escalate to global war, while others stay contained? At its core, the size of a war, as well as the incentive to start one, depends on expectations about who will join. Those expectations are, in turn, shaped by political economic integration and power relations. I provide a formal model of conflict that accounts for these factors. Using data on international disputes from 1816-2014, I estimate the effect of integration and power asymmetries on the incentives for conflict. The results suggest (1) network spillovers pacify potential joiners of war, reducing its scale and consequently encouraging initial attacks, and (2) countries bandwagon, causing a correlation between power inequality and the expected size of war in equilibrium. The model also facilitates counterfactual experiments of historical and contemporary cases of interest.